A proactive, timeous and effective response to the impact of changes on operational needs is essential if we are to sustain and build on the solid fundamentals of risk management already entrenched throughout the organisation.
South Africa's banking industry managed to remain structurally sound in the face of the global crisis, and Nedbank Group's stringent risk and capital management practices contributed to such structural soundness. This resilience was enhanced by a number of external factors, which include, but are not limited to, a strong regulator, early adoption of Basel II principles, conservative credit and monetary policies, and the successful implementation of the National Credit Act (NCA), which minimised irresponsible lending practices, overgearing and excessive consumer debt.
The group's risk philosophy emphasises the importance of risk as a business component. For this reason Nedbank Group strives to understand risk, manage it effectively, and evaluate it in the context of its potential for reward. Emphasis is placed on producing high-quality, sustainable earnings that will attract a premium rating for the group and protect the interests of shareholders, depositors and other stakeholders. This focus is supported by a number of industry policies and regulations, including regulation 40 of the Banks Act, King II and Basel II, as described above.
The board acknowledges that it is accountable and responsible for the entire process of risk management and for evaluating the effectiveness thereof. Management is accountable to the board for designing, implementing and monitoring the process of risk management and integrating it with day-to-day business operations. The Group RCMC is responsible for assisting the board in reviewing the risk management process and any significant risks facing the group.
Nedbank Group Limited has again strengthened its regulatory capital ratios in 2009, with a Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of 11,5% (2008: 9,6%) and a total capital adequacy ratio of 14,9% (2008: 12,4%). The core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio was 9,9% (2008: 8,2%).
Nedbank Limited has also strengthened regulatory capital ratios, with a Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of 11,7% (2008: 9,8%) and a total capital adequacy ratio of 15,6% (2008: 13,1%). The core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio was 9,6% (2008: 8,0%). All capital adequacy ratios are now well above the group's target ranges, including core Tier 1. They include unappropriated profits at the year-end to the extent that these are not expected to reverse and are expected to be appropriated subsequent to the year-end. Nedbank Group's capital adequacy ratios increased significantly over the past two years due to a strong focus on the optimisation of risk-weighted assets (capital), enabled by enhancing data quality and more selective asset growth using our economic-profit-based philosophy of managing for value, the retention of earnings, the profits made on the disposal of Visa shares in 2008 and the issuing of some non-core Tier 1 capital instruments. Additional Basel II information is included in the 2009 Annual Report.
Through its proactive approach to risk management, Nedbank Group has cultivated and embedded a conservative risk appetite focused on enhancing the basics and core activities of its banking processes.
The ERM approach is based on a 'three lines of defence' concept, which is the backbone of the group's Enterprisewide Risk Management Framework (ERMF) and incorporates an emphasis on accountability, responsibility, independence, reporting, communications and transparency.
The first line of defence is responsible for the management of risk (ie identification, measurement, control, monitoring and reporting). It comprises focused and informed involvement by the board and Nedbank Group Executive Committee (Exco), and accountability and responsibility of business management – all supported by appropriate internal control, risk management and governance structures, policies and processes. The second line of defence comprises Group Risk and EGC and is responsible for independent risk monitoring at a group level. The third line of defence provides independent objective assurance on the management of risk across the group. This is undertaken by Internal Audit and external auditors.
The group's values, its risk management approach and its business processes underpin its overall strategic approach to sustainability, and reflect the desire of the business to preserve the future for all its stakeholders.
The table below demonstrates this alignment between sustainability focus areas and objectives, the group's ERMF, stated Deep Green aspirations, the various risk management policies and the responsible board and executive governance structures in place across Nedbank Group:
| Sustainability focus areas |
Sustainability objectives |
Nedbank Group strategic focus and Deep Green aspirations |
ERMF – risks | Board and Exco risk management committees * |
Policies * |
| Economic | Strictly adhere to competitive governance and compliance practices. Effectively manage social, environmental and ethical risks. Commit to responsible lending. Build a sound reputation that translates into sound business benefits (ie lower cost of funding, enhanced client loyalty and client acquisition). Ensure a profitable business. |
Strategic focus Grow our share of economic profit. Become client-driven. Manage risk as an enabler. Enhance productivity and business execution. Deep Green aspirations Most respected bank. Great place to invest. Great place to bank. Worldclass at managing risk. Most respectable and aspirational brand. Unleashing synergies. |
Compliance risk. Social and environmental risk. Investment risk. Strategic risk. New-business risk. Credit risk. |
Directors’ Affairs Committee BRMF Group RCMC |
Credit policy Compliance policy Investment risk Strategic risk principles Reputational-risk policy |
| Cultural | Build corporate culture, values, ethics and leadership. Encourage diversity and transformation. Engage staff through staff volunteerism. |
Strategic focus
Evaluate people practices. Build a unique culture. Accelerate transformation. Deep Green aspirations Living our values. Leading transformation. |
People risk. Transformation risk. |
TRANSCO
Transformation and Human Resources Committee |
Strategic learning and growth policy Remuneration, rewards and recognition policy People transformation policy Code of Ethics Nedbank Employment Equity Forum (NEEF) |
| Social | Address topics that affect SA society, such as education, health, human rights, socioeconomic development, etc, in a systematic manner. Address our societal role Partner with communities and NGOs in addressing social needs sustainability. Assist in creating truly SA bank – a bank for all. |
Strategic focus
Lead as a corporate citizen. Deep Green aspirations Community of leaders. Highly involved in |
Reputational risk. Strategic risk. Environmental |
Bee Forum
Procurement Council Committee |
Corporate responsibility |
| Environmental | Minimise the direct Shift the environmental sustainability paradigm through: Partner with |
Strategic focus
Lead as a corporate citizen. Deep Green aspirations Highly involved in |
Reputational risk. Social and environmental risk. Strategic risk. |
Environmental forum |
Environmental |
Competitive risk management applied within Nedbank Retail
2009 was a tough year – both for individuals and businesses. Volumes were generally lower while credit risk increased. In line with these developments, Nedbank Retail implemented a number of initiatives under the umbrella of 'manage for value'. These included scorecard and loan-to-value (LTV) tightening and further investment in the collections environment. 100% LTV lending was reintroduced for low-risk clients at the end of September 2009. A specialised team was created to handle debt counselling and insurance shortfalls. Nedbank Retail has also reviewed its arrangement policies to align them more closely with the current economic cycle.
Nedbank Swaziland: Anti-money-laundering and combating of terrorist financing
The introduction of the Suppression of Terrorism Act 3 of 2008 necessitated the revision of Nedbank Swaziland's anti-money-laundering training material to include combating the financing of terrorism. It is anticipated that the material will be revised once the consolidated AML and CFT legislation has been completed. The consolidation is contained in the recently published Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (Prevention) Bill 2009. The bank is dedicated to ensuring the maintenance of a secure financial system and to that extent will continue its focus on client identification and profiling, transaction monitoring and crossborder screening; systems developments to enhance money-laundering control management; and AML and CFT training.The Equator Principles afford financial institutions an enhanced risk management framework to assess the potential environmental and social impacts of projects for which project finance is sought. Consideration of these risks is included in Nedbank Group’s policies and risk management frameworks and Nedbank Capital takes a collaborative approach with clients in addressing social and environmental concerns.
The assessment of social and environmental risks in terms of the Equator Principles determines the environmental and social risk management requirements and ensures that a relevant project is assigned a specific risk category based on the criteria developed by the International Finance Corporation (IFC). This categorisation differentiates projects based on the severity of their potential social and environmental impacts.
Deals are only approved subject to the condition that the specific Equator Principles are met. Once approved, Nedbank Capital continues to monitor the project for the duration of the loan. Compliance with social and environmental management plans is monitored and regular reports of independent environmental experts are received in respect of specific projects.
Nedbank has drafted sector guidelines in respect of certain industry sectors to support business by serving as an additional risk management tool. They incorporate principles aligned to the Equator Principles and extend beyond the Equator Principles by also providing guidance in respect of additional local and international benchmarks, legislative considerations and best-practice risk management considerations. The sector guidelines were drafted in consultation with the Worldwide Fund for Nature South Africa (WWF-SA).Nedbank’s level of implementation of the Equator Principles is assessed by Group Internal Audit and as part of an annual due diligence review conducted by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the African Development Bank (ADB).
Nedbank decided in 2008 to report Equator Principles- impacted transactions that have had initial drawdown during the year under review. According to such internal reporting criteria, Nedbank only reports in respect of a single mining and resources transaction for 2009. This is also a reflection of the prevailing market conditions.
| 2009 | Infrastructure finance | Mining and resources | Energy | |||||||
| # of deals |
Amount | Geographic location |
# of deals |
Amount | Geographic location |
# of deals |
Amount | Geographic location |
Total | |
| Total number of deals |
– | 1 | – | 1 | ||||||
| Category A | – | 1 | US$53m | Malawi | – | 1 | ||||
| Category B | – | – | – | |||||||
| Category C | – | – | – | |||||||
| Category A: | Projects with significant adverse impacts that may affect an area broader than the project site. |
| Category B: | Projects with fewer adverse impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas. |
| Category C: | Projects with little or no environmental impact. |