|
FOR NEDBANK GROUP SUSTAINABILITY IS ULTIMATELY ABOUT WALKING THE PATH TO A BETTER FUTURE, TOGETHER, AND HELPING ONE ANOTHER TO COMPLETE THE JOURNEY. THIS PHILOSOPHY DRIVES THE GROUP'S ASPIRATION TO MAKE THINGS HAPPEN, FOR ITS CLIENTS, STAFF, PARTNERS AND SHAREHOLDERS, AS WELL AS THE COMMUNITIES AND ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH IT OPERATES.' Dr Reuel Khoza: Nedbank Group Chairman
Sustainability in business is no longer an option, it is an imperative that makes sound business and moral sense. It must permeate every aspect of a business and inform the way it thinks, behaves, strategises and operates. This will ensure it optimises returns for its shareholders over the long term, while remaining a relevant business for its staff, clients, suppliers and the communities in which it operates.
Nedbank Group recognises this reality and the impact it has, not just on the realisation of its long-term vision, but also on the day-to-day actions it takes.
The group also recognises that the only effective approach to sustainability is one in which sustainable practices and philosophies are at the core of every aspect of the organisation impacting positively on people, philosophies, economics, the environment and the country as a whole.
For this reason Nedbank Groups approach to sustainability is a holistic and integrated one that brings together economic, environmental, social and cultural elements to ensure that sustainability is inextricably woven into the fabric of the organisation and enables it to realise its vision of becoming a leader in sustainability.
This integrated sustainability approach is reflected in the structure of this report, which is why the overviews of each of the business clusters are not exclusively focused on economic matters, but also cover all four sustainability pillars. However, there are many aspects of sustainability within Nedbank Group that cut across the entire organisation. This section of the report offers an overview of these groupwide sustainability initiatives and developments, particularly in the areas of environmental, social and cultural sustainability.
SUSTAINABILITY TARGETS: 2010 AND 2011
|
 |
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Effective stakeholder engagement remains central to the effectiveness of Nedbank Group’s collaborative approach to economic, environmental, social and cultural sustainability. Stakeholder engagement enhances risk management and presents the group with numerous opportunities, both to drive performance and extend its positive influence.
While the Group Executive Committee (Exco) remains ultimately responsible for stakeholder engagement, in 2010 Nedbank Group took its commitment to enhanced stakeholder engagement to the next level with the appointment of a dedicated Sustainability Stakeholder Engagement Manager, who is tasked with developing and sustaining relationships with various stakeholder groups.
In keeping with the group’s aspiration to ‘lead through collaboration’, such stakeholder engagement extends far beyond rules-driven disclosure or regulatory requirements. Rather, Nedbank Group considers stakeholder engagement a strategic imperative and seeks continually to evolve and innovate in terms of the way in which it builds inclusive, mutually beneficial relationships based on transparency, respect and idea sharing.
So, while stakeholder engagement within Nedbank Group may be decentralised and take many different forms, the ultimate aim is the same: to work with those who have an interest in the business to ensure sustainable performance and beneficial outcomes for all stakeholders.
The following pages outline the main instances of engagement with key stakeholders in Nedbank Group during 2010. Where no mention is made of specific feedback received, it can be taken that the engagement was of such a nature that no specific resulting feedback or action was deemed necessary by the parties concerned.
SHAREHOLDERS AND INVESTMENT
ANALYSTS |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To provide relevant and timeous information to current and future
shareholders, our providers of capital.
• To keep shareholders and the investment relations community
informed about Nedbank Group to ensure that its shares trade at a
fair value relative to those of peer companies.
|
|
Investor relations; local and international roadshows; ad hoc
communications; annual general meeting and other meetings;
conferences and presentations; Securities Exchange News Service
(SENS) announcements; media releases; analyst briefings; and
feedback via broker reports and the corporate website. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• A total of 142 investor meetings following results announcements.
• Nine broker conferences and seminars.
• Two teleconference presentations.
• Two investor lunches.
• Two annual credit rating reviews.
• Presentations at Investec Consumer Banking Seminar and Funding,
Liquidity and Capital Seminar, UBS Global Financial Services
Conference, Nedgroup Securities Conference, the 13th Annual UBS
Financials Conference and JP Morgan Investment Banking Conference.
• A further 146 other management meetings with shareholders,
analysts and rating agencies were held.
The content of these interactions, in addition to the items as addressed
in the normal course of investor relations, included Nedbank Retail
impairments and default advances, the Imperial Bank acquisition,
the HSBC proposed acquisition and the legal issues pertaining to
Pinnacle Point.
|
|
The credit ratings from Fitch and Moody’s for the group were affirmed
in July 2010 and have remained unchanged since then.
• Sustainability feedback was formally included in the 2010 interim
results analyst presentation and results booklet.
• The Nedbank Sustainability Outlook publication was created to
encourage a broader understanding of sustainability matters. See
here for further details or refer to
www.nedbankgroup.co.za for
copies of the publication.
• The group received numerous awards for formal communication
with shareholders and analysts, as well as reporting in 2010. These
represent a pleasing external validation of the positive impact of the
group’s efforts to communicate with this important stakeholder group. |
|
GOVERNMENT |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
- To build and strengthen relationships with government, both as a partner in the development of the country and as a current or potential client.
• To provide input into the legislative development process that will affect the activities of the group.
|
|
Public sector business; support and advisory services offered; support of
government social initiatives; and input into regulatory developments. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Ongoing interactions with government Departments through Nedbank
Group’s position on The Banking Association South Africa’s (BA SA’s)
working committees to the Department of Human Settlements, the
Department of Agriculture, the Department of Environmental Affairs,
the dti, and the National Treasury.
• Commentary provided on numerous regulatory developments in 2010.
Some of these included the Waste Act, the National Climate Change
Policy, Carbon Taxes and the Integrated Resource Plan 2 (IRP2). Comment
on IRP2 has been provided in the context of the existing Integrated
Energy Plan (IEP) and Renewable-Energy Feed-in Tariff (REFIT).
• Input on policy as well as negotiations in an effort to establish a
Financial Sector Code to replace the Financial Sector Charter (FSC).
• Nedbank Group actively participated in BASA’s ‘Teach a Child to Save’ project. staff members visited schools in six provinces and reached
9 125 children through the campaign, which is aimed at improving the
financial literacy level of children at an early stage.
• Participation with the dti in the design and calibration of a new
funding support model for small, medium and micro-enterprises
(SMMEs). |
|
• Value-added approach to building public sector client relationships has resulted in additional business being secured with numerous government
Departments, including:
− Department of Energy
− National Consumer Commission
− Department of Economic Development
− Tlokwe Municipality
− New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD)
− Department of Water Affairs
− SA National Parks
− SA Weather Services
− City of Tshwane
− Department of Public Works (Expanded Public Works Programme)
• Nedbank Group is actively involved in policy development and negotiations as part of the new Financial Sector Code. Negotiations in this regard continue.
• Commendations were received for all participants in the ‘Teach a Child to Save’ project and Nedbank has agreed to continue the project in 2011.
• The dti has acknowledged the value added by Nedbank Group in the design of the new funding support model and has accordingly requested that the group be one of its first partners in implementing
the model. |

REGULATORY BODIES |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
| To maintain good relationships with regulators and ensure compliance
with their legal and regulatory requirements, thereby retaining Nedbank
Group’s various operating licences and minimising its operational risk. |
|
Ongoing meetings and interaction with regulators, including prudential
visits and statutory reporting. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Sound relationships are maintained with all regulators and supervisors,
including: the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), the South African
Reserve Bank (SARB), JSE Limited (the JSE), the Financial Services Board
(FSB) and relevant offshore regulators.
• Engagement with SARB takes place through various forums, from
trilateral meetings with the board and group audit committees to one on-
one meetings with various executive officials at prudential meetings.
• Engagements with the FIC regulators and supervisors take place
on a bimonthly basis through the Nedbank/Regulators Anti-money
Laundering (AML)/Combating the Financing of Terrorists (CFT)
meeting. Further engagement takes place through formal and informal
communication channels. The bimonthly meetings enable Nedbank
Group to communicate with the regulator and supervisors to ensure
compliance with their requirements and obtain clarification, where
necessary.
• In terms of the FSB obligation to ensure that financial service
providers comply with the requirements of the Financial Advisory
and Intermediary Services (FA IS) Act the FSB supervision Department
conducted a Nedbank Group review during July 2010. The review
included interviews with the Chief Executive (CE), the Chief
Governance and Compliance Officer, managing executives, cluster
governance and compliance heads, FAIS key individuals and FAIS
representatives as well as onsite visits to several Nedbank branches. |
|
• Trilateral meetings held with the board and group audit committees.
• A total of 37 SARB prudential meetings were held and no major
concerns were raised during these engagements.
• Following the FIC engagements, accountable and reporting institutions
were registered by 1 December 2010, cash threshold reporting was
implemented and historical STR information was aligned.
• No material deficiencies were raised by the FSB during its closing
review meeting. The FSB acknowledged Nedbank Group for its support
and the provision of information required for its review. The formal
FSB report is anticipated in due course.
• Engagements in 2010 focused on cash threshold reporting,
accountable-institution and reporting-institution registration, product
approvals, suspicious-transaction reporting (STR) and training. Positive
feedback was received on the rollout of initiatives and confirmation
was received of the alignment of STRs. Guidance was provided on
requirements for products and approval of products. |
STAFF |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To ensure that Nedbank Group remains an employer of choice by
providing a safe, positive and inspiring working environment.
• To understand and respond to staff needs and concerns.
• To provide all staff with direction and pertinent information regarding
the activities and strategic focus areas of the group. |
|
• A robust combination of face-to-face, written and broadcast
communications. These included culture and engagement surveys,
roadshows, email, intranet, data casting and magazines and relevant
training. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Three groupwide surveys conducted and feedback provided.
• Altogether 16 countrywide, formal face-to-face roadshows with Group
Executive Committee members.
• Four formal interactions with the Group Executive Committee
countrywide via audiovisual broadcasts.
• 3sixty magazine (six editions) annually and daily online email updates.
• An annual engagement on the group’s strategic direction held with
top management.
• Monitoring and consulting with staff across the group on employment
equity matters via NEEF. |
|
• Specific research was undertaken with middle management following
the results of the surveys, and training interventions were developed
to address some of the findings. In addition, managers were given
extra support with the production of an electronic newsletter
containing pertinent information on managing others effectively.
Three editions were distributed in 2010.
• A number of employee wellbeing events were held in 2010. These
events included a Men’s Health Day and World Aids Day celebrations.
• Nedbank Group launched free HIV testing for Nedbank Group
employees. |
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL NON-GOVERNMENT
ORGANISATIONS AND COMMUNITIES |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To create partnerships that will best facilitate Nedbank Group’s
integrated sustainability activities.
• To obtain input from communities and representative non-government
organisations (NGOs) regarding key focus areas.
• To obtain input from environmental experts to ensure that Nedbank
Group’s operations are taking place in the most environmentally
responsible manner.
• To create awareness of Nedbank Group’s integrated sustainability
initiatives. |
|
Ongoing support of projects and interaction by the Nedbank Foundation
with a wide variety of non-profit and government organisations.
Environmental/Sustainability partnerships with the World Wide Fund for
Nature South Africa (WWF-SA), Cambridge Programme for Sustainable
Leadership, University of South Africa (UNISA) Advisory Council on
Business and Climate Change and the United Nations Environment
Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI). |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• The Nedbank Foundation works closely with the local leadership of the
communities within which it operates to identify the most appropriate
and meaningful projects to fund. During 2010, in partnership with
Wiphold, the Imbizo process was used to engage with numerous local
communities.
• The World Cup and the teachers’ strike resulted in the 2010 matric
pupils facing additional challenges. As education is a large focus area for
the foundation, it found a solution together with numerous other NGOs
and the Department of Education to aid students.
• Nedbank Group has a formal conservation partnership with WWFSA
and as such WWF-SA was represented on the Nedbank Group
Environmental Forum and the Nedbank/WWF Carbon-neutral Task
Team.
• Nedbank Group is represented on various UNEP FI committees and
workstreams, including the role of chair of the UNEP FI African Task
Force and cochair of the Water and Finance Workstream.
• Various engagements with the UN Global Compact.
• The Cambridge Programme for Sustainable Leadership facilitated a
think tank session with Nedbank Group’s sustainability, product and
strategy teams.
• UNISA Advisory Council on Business and Climate Change– Nedbank Group, along with other corporates, has provided input into
the climate-related research, stakeholder engagements and education
programmes. |
|
• In the Mbashe District of the Eastern Cape one of the needs identified
by the elders was access to water. The group’s response was the
Hippo
Roller Project .
• The Matric Revision Programme was the joint response
to the issues raised by pupils, NGOs and the government alike.
• WWF-SA consistently challenges the Nedbank Group environmental
status quo and has been involved in the setting of intensity reduction
targets and the achievement of carbon neutrality.
• During Nedbank Group’s chairmanship of the UNEP FI ATF membership
was expanded and this has resulted in a greater African participation in
relevant environmental issues.
• Nedbank Group contributed to the UNEP FI Liquidity Series to drive
awareness of global water issues.
• Nedbank Group’s Communication of Progress in terms of the UN Global
Compact was well-received and met all requirements. Nedbank Group
provided input into the UN Global Compact’s human rights initiative for
South Africa.
• New products and initiatives are under development as a result of a
think tank session and there is greater internal cohesion in terms of
greening efforts.
• Climate-related programme developments are underway and
interactions are ongoing. |
SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To maintain an ideal and timeous supply of goods and services for
Nedbank Group’s operations.
• To assist suppliers in ensuring their own viability through education,
early-payment terms and other support.
• To encourage environmentally responsible practices in the group’s
supply chain. |
|
Ongoing interaction with suppliers and contractors includes supplier
education workshops, a quarterly newsletter on sustainability matters
and one-on-one negotiations. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Nedbank Group focused on increasing its spend with black economic
empowerment (BEE) suppliers, with particular focus on BWO
businesses.
• Nedbank Group engaged with suppliers to share its environmental
journey and to encourage suppliers to change their behaviour.
• The group conducted independent life cycle analyses (LCA) to
understand the full environmental impact of the various paper types.
• Approximately two dozen environmentally friendly stationery
products were evaluated to ensure environmental and business needs
are met.
• Courier services were evaluated to reduce costs and carbon emissions. |
|
• The focus on improving the group’s rate of spend proved successful as
the spend with BWO businesses rose by almost 3% in 2010 to 5,24%.
• In terms of spend Nedbank Group’s largest suppliers are in the
information technology (IT) domain. It is pleasing to see that a large
number of these suppliers are actively working to reduce their carbon
emissions. Disappointingly, however, following a survey, only 3% of
the group’s new suppliers onboarded in 2010 have an environmental
policy in place. Accordingly, in 2011, efforts will focus on working with
suppliers to improve this position.
• Paper suppliers were engaged with to gain a better understanding of
the results of the LCA and to encourage further improvements in their
environmental practices.
• While environmentally friendly stationery items were a good fit
with the group’s environmental policies, the costs were excessive.
The possibility of combining orders with other organisations is being
investigated to benefit from economies of scale.
• The group’s main courier vendor has introduced new vehicles with
improved fuel efficiency and a bigger load capacity. A careful evaluation of
all collection routes resulted in an overall travel reduction. |
BUSINESS PARTNERS |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To continue learning through interaction with industry and crosssectoral
organisations.
• To establish and build strategic partnerships.
• To use business associations as a forum to promote Nedbank Group’s
viewpoint on key issues. |
|
Membership of industry associations and bodies [BA SA and the National
Business Initiative (NBI)]; strategic partnerships such as with the group’s
black business partners (BBPs), Wiphold, Brimstone and Aka Capital. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Ongoing participation in all BASA working groups and projects remains a
key imperative. Nedbank Group is a member of a variety of committees
within BA SA, dealing with specific sustainability aspects.
• Engagements with the NBI Climate Change Working Group.
• BBPs are represented on relevant Nedbank Group committees and
forums, eg the Transformation and Sustainability Board Subcommittee
and BEE Forum. |
|
• Nedbank Group participates actively in the BASA Sustainable Finance
Forum, an umbrella/strategic body that addresses issues critical to
the long-term sustainability of the banking sector. Meetings are held
monthly as well as when ad hoc issues arise.
• Nedbank Group has provided commentary on environmental regulatory
developments through the NBI structure.
• Learnings from interactions with the NBI and BASA have served to
enhance the group’s sustainability focus in a number of business areas.
• Referrals were received from clients, resulting in revenue generation in
the Corporate and Capital areas.
• Successful community engagements or Imbizos were held to help to
deepen Nedbank’s relationships with the communities in Centani and
Dutywa. |
CLIENTS |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To make current and potential clients aware of Nedbank Group’s
products and services.
• To understand and resolve client concerns or complaints and utilise
these to improve service. |
|
Business interaction via Nedbank Group outlets; client education
workshops; client satisfaction surveys; client complaint lines and call
centres, and marketing and advertising activities. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• AskOnce service delivery campaign.
• CMAT™ assessment.
• Ask Afrika Orange Index.
• Internal client satisfaction scores.
• Client complaint tracker system.
• Consumer education.
• Small-business seminars. |
|
Six major themes were raised by clients during 2010, including:
| Issue |
Action |
• Access to finance
• Access to financial services
• Improved service levels
• Relevant products
• Financial literacy |
• Refer to the Nedbank Business
Banking and Retail business
overviews section.
• Sustainable Development
Performance section. |
|
MEDIA |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
• To use the media as a channel to communicate with relevant stakeholders.
• To position Nedbank Group proactively as a thought leader, the bank
of choice for all South Africans and a responsible corporate citizen.
• To respond to media queries as they pertain to banking and relevant
industry activities, including environmental issues. |
|
Communication and relationship building with key journalists and
general media to position a brand-led organisation proactively (external
communication of the Nedbank Group leadership, brand, values and
product offering). |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Daily liaison with various media contacts regarding business-related
issues.
• Formal media briefings were held on the appointment of Mike Brown,
M-PESA and 360life product launches, achievement of carbon
neutrality, participation in the intensified matric education drive, as
well as numerous product launches and relevant industry issues such
as client indebtedness. |
|
• Top of mind for the media in 2010 were issues that related to the
proposed HSBC deal, Pinnacle Point, carbon neutrality, Mike Brown’s
appointment, interest rate trends, economic trend data such as the
consumer price index, the Imperial Bank integration and the annual
pricing review.
• Nedbank Group spokespeople availability was raised as an issue by the
media. This has been actively addressed through deliberate one-on-one
relationship building with key journalists and media training for
relevant spokespeople. |
UNIONS |
| Reasons for engagement |
|
Types of engagement |
| To maintain a good working relationship with the unions and obtain approval or reach consensus on any decisions or projects that require changes in working conditions or to the operational requirements of the business. |
|
Group Human Resources (HR) manages labour relations with the unions on an ongoing basis and consults on any changes in working conditions, restructures of the business, as well as performance management issues. This includes consultations on the resolution of alleged unfair labour practices to ensure the fair and equitable treatment of staff. |
| Examples of engagement |
|
Feedback/Resulting sustainability actions |
• Monthly and quarterly consultations by means of special joint committee meetings.
• Annual salary negotiations.
• Workplace engagements via NEEF.
• Updates on the achievement of staff meeting the legislated FAIS qualification requirements.
• Positive feedback from unions on the group’s ongoing integrated sustainability initiatives in the community. |
|
• Approval of the Workforce Skills Plan. |
|